Research report
Platform pulse: what engineering leaders will fund in 2027
Budgets are flat; expectations are not. Our annual survey of 320 technology leaders shows where the money moves next year, and what is being cut to pay for it.

About the survey
Flat budgets, rising expectations
Each summer we ask technology leaders what they plan to fund next year. This year 320 answered, from organizations of 250 to 20,000 people across ten industries. The median budget for 2027 is 1% above 2026, less than inflation. Yet three in four leaders say they are expected to deliver more.
The survey ran from July 6 to August 14, 2026. Respondents were chief technology officers, chief information officers and heads of engineering. This is the fourth edition of Platform pulse, so most questions can be compared with the three before it.
The answer to flat budgets is not a single big bet. It is a steady movement of money from things that are bought to things that are built and owned, and from experiments to systems in daily use.
The headline numbers
Where 2027 is heading
- +1%
- Median planned change in technology budgets for 2027, below inflation.
- 74%
- Leaders expected to deliver more next year with the same budget or less.
- 58%
- Leaders who will increase spending on internal platforms and developer tooling.
- 64%
- Leaders funding at least one AI system in daily use in 2027, up from 29% this year.
KIASA, Platform pulse 2027. Survey of 320 technology leaders, July to August 2026.
Flat is the new growth
For the second year running, most leaders will not get more money. The median plan is 1% higher than 2026, and one leader in four expects a cut. What has changed is the tone. In 2025, leaders described flat budgets as a pause. This year they describe them as normal, and they are planning around them rather than waiting them out.
Where the money moves
Four areas will grow at the expense of almost everything else. The largest is internal platforms: the shared tools, pipelines and environments that let product teams ship without waiting. 58% of leaders will spend more on them in 2027. They see a platform as the way to get more out of the same engineers.
- Internal platforms and developer tooling: 58% will increase spending.
- AI in daily use, rather than in pilots: 64% will fund at least one production system.
- Security: 71% call it the one budget line they will not cut.
- Data quality and ownership: 49% will increase spending, often to support AI.
71%Leaders who name security as the one budget line they will protect whatever happens.
What is being cut to pay for it
Every increase is paid for somewhere. The largest single source is overlapping software licenses: 52% of leaders plan to consolidate tools that do the same job. Next come on-premises hardware, which 44% will not renew, and contractors, which 37% will reduce. The most telling cut is to experiments: 46% will stop funding AI pilots that have no plan to reach daily use.
“We have eleven pilots and two systems people actually use. Next year we fund the two and finish three more. The rest stop.”
AI moves from pilot to payroll
In 2026, 29% of leaders had an AI system in daily use. For 2027, 64% plan to. The money for this is not new. It comes from pilots that are being stopped and from the licenses being consolidated. Leaders told us the hardest part is not the model but the data underneath it, which is why data quality appears among the rising budgets for the first time.

The measurement gap
Leaders who could say how much they spend running each system, about a third of the sample, expected to cut 40% less from their 2027 plans than those who could not. Knowing what you run makes it easier to defend what you need and to find what you do not.
What this means for your 2027 plan
- Expect to fund growth by stopping things, and decide what to stop before the budget round, not during it.
- Treat your internal platform as a product with customers, so its value can be shown.
- Fund only the AI work that has a path to daily use and an owner on the business side.
- Measure running costs by system now, so next year's conversation starts from facts.
Key findings
Six findings from Platform pulse 2027
Budgets are flat for a second year
The median planned change for 2027 is +1%. One leader in four expects a cut; one in eight expects an increase of more than 5%.
Platforms are the top area for growth
58% of leaders will increase spending on internal platforms and developer tooling, up from 44% a year ago. Leaders at organizations with fewer than 1,000 people are the most likely to buy this as a managed service.
AI is moving into daily use
64% of leaders will fund at least one AI system in daily use in 2027, compared with 29% in 2026. Most name finance, customer service or document handling as the first area.
Security is protected
71% of leaders named security as the one line they would not cut. Of those, most plan to spend more on fixing known weaknesses and less on new tools.
Licenses pay for most of it
52% plan to consolidate overlapping software. On average, leaders expect to retire one tool in five of those they pay for today.
Pilots without a path are ending
46% will stop funding AI pilots with no plan to reach daily use. Leaders described a fatigue with pilots in their boards that was not there a year ago.
Before you sign off
Five questions for your 2027 budget
What will we stop?
Name the tools, contracts and pilots that end next year, and what each one frees.
What does each system cost to run?
If you cannot answer by system, make measuring it the first item of 2027.
Who are the platform's customers?
List the teams your platform serves and what each one needs from it next year.
Which AI work reaches daily use?
Fund work with a business owner and a date for going live. Pause the rest.
What security debt will we repay?
Set aside a fixed share of capacity to fix known weaknesses, not only to buy new tools.
Authors
The research team
Aiko Tanaka
Director of Research
Aiko has run Platform pulse since its first edition in 2023.
Lukas Hartmann
Partner, Strategy and Advisory
Jonas helps technology leaders cost and sequence their plans before anything is built.
Grace Liu
Senior Research Analyst
Grace led the analysis and the year-on-year comparisons in this edition.
Related
Keep reading
Research report
The maintenance dividend
We asked 140 engineering leaders where their budgets go. On average, 61% is spent keeping existing systems running. The best performers spend half that.
Research report
AI in the back office: where the first real savings are showing up
Across 60 finance, claims and supply teams, the returns so far come from four unglamorous tasks. We name them, with numbers.
Perspective
Why the second year of a cloud migration matters more than the first
The move itself is the easy part. Costs, habits and ownership settle in year two, and that is where most of the promised value is won or lost.
Announcement
KIASA launches Canopy, a managed platform team for mid-size enterprises
A standing team that runs your cloud platform, keeps it secure and reports back each month in plain language.
Test your 2027 plan against your peers
We will compare your budget with the 320 in this year's survey and show you where you differ, and whether it matters.